The Hereditary Trustee, v. Hari Haran
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition sought vacation of an interim injunction regarding temple shops. The Court modified the injunction, directing petitioners to pay 50% rental arrears within four weeks and the remaining 50% thereafter, warning automatic vacation of the order for non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Directed petitioners to pay 50% rental arrears within four weeks and remaining 50% within subsequent four weeks; non-compliance leads to vacation of interim order and dismissal of related W.M.P.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Ninth day of April Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
WMP(MD) No.5494 of 2019 IN WP(MD) No.8820 of 2018
THE HEREDITARY TRUSTEE, A/M.MARIAMMAN KOVIL, ALLITHURAI ROAD, SRIRANGAM, TIRUCHIRAPALLI, REP.BY MR.T.R.RAMAKODI GUPTHA. ... PETITIONER/ 2nd RESPONDENT/ 2nd RESPONDENT
Vs
1 HARI HARAN
- 2 VIDHYA LAKSHMI
- 3 R.SHANTHI
- 4 MUTHAIYAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim injunction restraining eviction of shop occupants should be modified upon non-payment of rent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THE HEREDITARY TRUSTEE, A/M.MARIAMMAN KOVIL, ALLITHURAI ROAD, SRIRANGAM, TIRUCHIRAPALLI
- respondent
HARI HARAN
- respondent
VIDHYA LAKSHMI
- respondent
R.SHANTHI
- respondent
MUTHAIYAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court