The Secretary, v. Sudhakar
Case brief
What is this about?
This order vacates the interim stay in the main writ petition concerning a tender process. The proceedings for the vacating application lacked representation, so the court placed the matter on record as closed.
What did the court decide?
Vacated the interim stay in the writ petition; application discharged.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN
WMP(MD) No.3175 of 2019 IN WMP(MD).No.19499 of 2018 IN WP(MD) No.21598 of 2018
WMP(MD) No.3175 of 2019 IN WP(MD) No.21598 of 2018:
1 THE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT,
FORT ST.GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.
2 THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT, EZHILAGAM, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-600 005.
- 3 THE DIRECTOR,
INSTITUTE OF ROAD TRANSPORT,
100 FEET ROAD, TARAMANI, CHENNAI-600 113. ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3/ RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHAKAR
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF ROAD TRANSPORT
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court