State through v. Ramar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Appeal filed against an interlocutory order directing the respondent to release a confiscated vehicle upon deposit of Rs.4,00,000. The High Court held the appeal devoid of merits and dismissed it.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
W.A.[MD]No.349 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.VINEET KOTHARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.A.[MD]No.349 of 2019 and C.M.P.[MD]No.2900 of 2019
State through, Authorized Officer, District Forest Officer, Dindigul Region, Dindigul.
: Appellant / Respondent
Vs.
Ramar : Respondent / Petitioner
PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to set aside the common order dated 15.02.2019 in W.M.P.[MD] No.2684 of 2019 in W.P.[MD]No.3413 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State through Authorized Officer, District Forest Officer, Dindigul Region, Dindigul
- respondent
Ramar
Coram
Vineet Kothari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court