on the candidates and the candidates cannot contend that the condition cannot be enforced on the candidates after having been submitted an application for recruitment pursuant to such notification. However, in our considered view, the case on hand appears to be a very unique case and within which there is no advantage which will accrued to the first respondent/writ petitioner. In fact, if the incorrect date of birth was mentioned, there will be an advantage to the first respondent/writ petitioner. Therefore, in our view the candidature of the first respondent/writ petitioner need not be invalidated on the ground stated by the appellant. We make it clear that this observation should not be taken to be a precedent or laid down a legal proposition and observations have been made purely considered the facts of the case. Only for such reason, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. Time for implementation of the order passed by the Writ Court is extended for a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
