5.Admittedly, the appellants are Inspectors of Survey and Land Records and they were permitted to act as in charge of Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records. The order placing them incharge clearly states that they shall draw the salary in the cadre of Inspector of Survey and land Records and not the salary for Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records. The learned Single Judge is fully justified in rejecting the prayer sought for. Very recently, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has rejected the similar request made by a retired Acting Chief Justice for Scale of pay on par with the retired Chief Justice of a High Court. Admittedly, the conditions, based on which the appellants were placed as Full Additional Charge, have not been questioned by the appellants. Therefore, there is no question of granting the Scale of Pay as Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records to the appellants. Therefore, we find no reason to interfere with the common order of the learned Judge.