5.From the materials placed before us, we find that there has been a delay at different stages, while effecting payments due to the respondent/writ petitioner. The appellant Corporation seeks to justify their action by stating that after the writ petition was disposed of, the respondent had to be notionally elevated as special grade in the cadre of Superintendent with effect from 2005. Thereafter, the pay has to be revised in the cadre of selection grade Superintendent and Special Grade Superintendent and all these proceedings have to be completed which undoubtedly would be time consuming, but the appellant Corporation took effective steps to do the same at the earliest and disbursal have been effected between 2011-13. From the proceedings dated 29.05.2014, which was impugned in the writ petition, it is clear that the date on which the payments were released have been mentioned. It is undoubtedly true that the disbursement of amount on account of notional re-fixation of the respondent in the higher scale of pay etc is time consuming. Nevertheless, the writ petition was disposed of in the year 2010, and even going by the said date, there has been delay in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
