Partly allowed

M/s.Leitwind Shriram v. The Assistant/Deputy

Madras HC21 Nov 2019WA/948/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the appellant to withdraw a Writ Appeal challenging a Single Judge''s order regarding customs seizure and duty payment, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn with liberty to raise points before CESTAT.

What did the court decide?

Permitted withdrawal of Writ Appeal; dismissed appeal as withdrawn with liberty to move interlocutory application to CESTAT for release of goods.

M/s.Leitwind Shriram Vs The Assistant/Deputy — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.11.2019

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶7

W.A.NO.948 OF 2018

¶8

AND CMP NO.8075 OF 2018

¶9

M/s.Leitwind Shriram Manufacturing Limited Plot No.D-17, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District - 601 201. Rep. by its General Manager (Supply Chain) and Authorized Signatory V.Ravichandran

¶10

.. Appellant

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Gr.4) No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House, Chennai - 600 001.

¶13

2.The Commissioner of Customs (SIIB) Chennai III Commissionerate No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House, Chennai - 600 001.

¶14

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (SIIB) Chennai III Commissionerate No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House, Chennai - 600 001. 4.The Appraiser (SIIB) No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House, Chennai - 600 001. .. Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.33914 of 2017 dated 01.03.2018 and the same received by the appellant/petitioner on 11.04.2018.

¶16

1/3

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records connected with the Seizure Memo dated 04.10.2017 in file F.No.ENO/91/2017-SIIB issued by the 4^th respondent herein and to quash the same,insofar as the said Seizure Memo issued is without jurisdiction, authority of law, against the provisions of law and in total violation to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein to allow the clearance of the goods covered under Ex-Bond Bill of Entry No.3056014 dated 31.08.2017 without requiring the payment of Anti Dumping Duty under Notification No.17/2017 Customs (ADD) dated 11.05.2017.

¶19

The learned counsel for the appellant is seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the present Writ Appeal directed against the order dated 01.03.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.33914 of 2017 filed by the appellant/petitioner M/s.M/s.Leitwind Shriram Manufacturing Limited and raise all the points involved in the present Writ Appeal before the learned Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) where his appeal is pending. He further submitted that since the goods are still detained by the respondent Department, he may be permitted to move an Interlocutory Application before the learned CESTAT with a request to decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

¶20

The learned counsel for the Revenue has no objection to the withdrawal of the Writ Appeal.

¶21

We, therefore, permit the learned counsel for the appellant to withdraw this Writ Appeal and is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise all the points before the learned CESTAT in the pending appeal and further liberty is given to the appellant to move the Interlocutory Application before the learned CESTAT for release of the goods,

¶22

2/3

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

which may be decided expeditiously, by the learned CESTAT. We also expect that the CESTAT decide the appeal filed by the appellant, on its own merit and uninfluenced by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶25

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶26

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
TK
To
1.The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner
of Customs (Gr.4)
No.60, Rajaji Salai,
Customs House, Chennai - 600 001.
2.The Commissioner of Customs (SIIB)
Chennai III Commissionerate
No.60, Rajaji Salai,
Customs House, Chennai - 600 001.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of Customs (SIIB)
Chennai III Commissionerate
No.60, Rajaji Salai, Customs House,
Chennai - 600 001.
4.The Appraiser (SIIB)
No.60, Rajaji Salai,
Customs House,
Chennai - 600 001.
+1cc to Mr.V.Sundareswaran, Advocate sr.96954
W.A.NO.948 OF 2018
ks(co)
nr 04/02/2020

¶27

3/3

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Leitwind Shriram v. The Assistant/Deputy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Leitwind Shriram v. The Assistant/Deputy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Vs the All India Council for

Archanathangam Vs the Authorised Officer

M/S Bata India Limited Vs the Commissioner of Customs

Commissioner of GST and Central Excise Vs the Commissioner Ranipet Municipality

M/s.Annai Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Authorised Officer

Indian Officers Club, Vs the Commissioner of