R.v.Ruthrapathi, v. Government of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant, who was directed to appear in the previous hearing without representation.
Writ Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the appellant, who was directed to appear in the previous hearing without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE DR.VINEET KOTHARI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.A.No.407 of 2013
R.V.Rutrapathi .. Appellant/Petitioner
-vs-
1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by its Secretary,
Department of Hindu Religious and
Charitable Endowment Board,
Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
2. The Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable
Endowment Board,
113, Mahatma Gandhi Salai,
Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai.
3. The Joint Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
Board, S.M.Salai,
Thanjavur.
4. The Assistant Commissioner,
(Fit person Arulmigu Vedaraneewarar Temple)
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board,
Nagapattinam.
5. The Executive Officer,
Arulmigu Vedaraneeswarar Temple,
Vedaraniam Post 614 810
Nagapattinam District.
6. The Executive Officer,
Municipality,
Vedaraniam Post 614 810
Nagapattinam District. .. Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Section 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 01.11.2012, in W.P.No.911 of 2011.
WP.NO.911 of 2011:
PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent proceeding vide R.P.No.32/2010/D2, dated 5.10.2010 to quash the same and direct the fifth respondent to continuously permit the petitioner as a permanent regular lessee of the fifth respondent temple or an alternative adjacent place may be provided to the petitioner.
When the matter came up for hearing on 05.11.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, this matter was directed to be posted on 11.11.2019 under the caption “for dismissal” and the matter is listed today.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
To:
rep. by its Secretary,
Department of Hindu Religious and
Charitable Endowment Board, Secretariat, Fort St. George,
Chennai-600 009.
R.V.Rutrapathi
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board
The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board
The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Vedaraneeswarar Temple
Vineet Kothari
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court