Dismissed

The Secretary to Government v. Antony Prakash Raj

Madras HC15 Oct 2019WA/149/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge allowed a writ petition by students of a private medical college to transfer them to a Government college. The subsequent review opened the path to Supreeme Court, and the instant appeal was dismissed as infructuous due to the infructuous nature.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

The Secretary to Government Vs Antony Prakash Raj — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.10.2019 CORAM :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.A.No.149 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.1421 of 2019

¶4

1.The Secretary of Government Health and Family Welfare Department of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai 600 009.

¶5

2.The Director of Medical Education, 156, Poonamalle High Road, New Bupathy Nagar, Chetput, Chennai 600 031. ... Appellants/Respondents 2 and 3 in WP

¶6

¶7

1.Antony Prakash Raj S/o S.Boscopaul raj 3/309, Madha Medicals, Palani Main Road, Reddiyarchatram, Dindigul(DT)-624622.

¶8

2.The Health Secretary Ministry, Health and Family Welfare, Government of India Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 11.

¶9

3.The Secretary, Medical Council of India Pocket – 14 Sector – 8 Dwarka, New Delhi. 4.The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, 69, Anna Salai Guindy, Chennai 602 117.

¶10

5.Ponniyah Ramajayam Institute of Medical Sciences, Manamai-Nallur East Coast Road, Mahabalipuram, Chennai-600009. ... Respondents/Petitioner/Respondents 1, 4, 5 & 6 in WP

¶11

PRAYER : Appeal against the order dated 13.12.2018 made in W.P.No.14637 of 2018 on the file of this Court.

¶12

Prayer in WP No.14637 of 2018 (WA No.149/2019) : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the all the respondents other than the 6th respondent to transfer the petitioner from the 6th respondent college to any other Government medical college

¶13

For Appellants :Mr.T.M.Pappiah learned Special Government Pleader

¶14

For Respondents :M/s.Row & Reddy (for R1) Mr.B.Rabu Manohar (for R2) Central Government standing counsel Mr.V.P.Raman (for R3) Standing counsel Mr.D.Ravichander (for R4) Standing counsel

¶15

J U D G M E N T

¶16

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J)

¶17

Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader would submit that the Writ Appeal has become infructuous.

¶18

2.The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the Writ Petition has been filed by the students of Ponnaiyah Ramajayam Institute of Medical Sciences (PRIMS) and the learned single Judge had allowed the Writ Petition. Meanwhile against an interim order of the learned single Judge, a review petition had been filed. The Review Petition review was allowed, setting aside the order passed by the learned single Judge, by which accommodation was ordered in the Government Medical colleges. Against the order passed in the review petition also, the students went before the Hon'ble Supreme court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court confirmed the order passed in the Review Petition. It is also submitted by Mr.T.M.Pappiah, learned Special Government Pleader that pursuant to the order passed by this Court all the students who were admitted in Ponniyah Ramajayam Institute of Medical Sciences had joined in private Medical Colleges.

¶19

3.In this circumstances, the Appeal filed against the original order of the learned single Judge has become

¶20

infructuous. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions is also closed.

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶22

//True copy//

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

ay/sai

¶25

¶26

1.The Health Secretary Ministry, Health and Family Welfare, Government of India Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 11. 2.The Secretary, Medical Council of India Pocket – 14 Sector – 8 Dwarka, New Delhi. 3.The Secretary of Government Health and Family Welfare Department of Tamil Nadu, St. George Fort, Chennai 600 009.

¶27

4.The Director of Medical Education, 156, Poonamalle High Road, New Bupathy Nagar, Chetput, Chennai 600 031.

¶28

The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, 69, Anna Salai Guindy, Chennai-602117

¶29

+1cc to Government Pleader, High Court, Madras 104 SR.No.86867

¶30

W.A.No.149 of 2019

¶31

RSK(CO) GMY(22/11/2019)

The Secretary to Government v. Antony Prakash Raj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Secretary to Government v. Antony Prakash Raj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Management of Tamil Nadu Vs the Presiding Officer

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs K.Renuga

R.Gnaneswaran Vs the Commissioner

The Secretary to Government Vs Su.Archana

The Secretary to Government Vs v.Baskar Raja

The Secretary of Government Vs P.Kishore Kumar