Intra-court appeal by electricity corporation officials challenging a lower court order granting monetary benefits to an employee. The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel, leading to its dismissal.
Intra-court appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A. No. 1028 of 2018 and
C.M.P. No. 8614 of 2018
Salem.
Salem. ...Appellants/Respondent
Vs.
R.Ganesan ... Respondent/Petitioner
Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 10.01.2018 made in W.P. No. 34679 of 2012.
W.P.34679/2012:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the 2nd Respondent proceedings made in Proceeding No.ACE/SEDC/ADM III/A4/F.DKT.C.NO:1141/2012 dated 29.09.2012 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd Respondents to disburse the monetary benefits from 13.08.2002 to 28.02.2011 to the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For Appellants : Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Arumugarajan
[Judgment of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.]
The learned counsel for the appellants made an endorsement indicating that he is withdrawing the intra court appeal.
W.A. No. 1028 of 2018
VGII(CO) SP(08/04/2019)
K.K.SASIDHARAN
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
