Allowed

Nithya Ravichandran v. Rohan Krishnamoorthy

Madras HC17 Dec 2019TR CMP/773/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a petition to transfer a Hindu Marriage Opposing Party (H.M.O.P.) matter from the Subordinate Court at Tambaram to the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai. The court imposed a directive to conclude the trial expeditiously within thirty working days.

What did the court decide?

The H.M.O.P. No.208 of 2019 pending in Subordinate Court, Tambaram, is withdrawn and transferred to IV Additional Family Court, Chennai. The petitioner's petition is allowed.

Nithya Ravichandran Vs Rohan Krishnamoorthy — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17/12/2019

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶4

Tr.C.M.P. No.773 of 2019 and C.M.P. No.21611 of 2019

¶5

Nithya Ravichandran D/o.Dr.R.Ravichandran

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
Rohan Krishnamoorthy ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P. No.208 of 2019 pending on the file of Subordinate Court, Tambaram to the file of IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶9

Petitioner : Ms.V.Pushkala Respondent : Mr.S.Anand

¶10

ORDER

¶11

The transfer civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to withdraw and transfer H.M.O.P. No.208 of 2019 pending on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram, to the file of IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶12

When the matter came up for hearing today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that, the respondent, has no objection for transferring H.M.O.P. No.208 of 2019 pending on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram, to the file of IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.

¶13

In view of the same, H.M.O.P. No.208 of 2019 pending on the file of Sub Court, Tambaram, is withdrawn from the said court and transferred to the file of IV Additional Family Court, Chennai. The learned IV Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, is expected to conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible, without adjourning the matter beyond thirty working days, at any point of time, in order to bring the issue to a logical end.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

With the above direction, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
// True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Asr
To
1)The Subordinate Court, Tambaram.
2)The IV Additional Family Court, Chennai.
Tr.C.M.P. No.773 of 2019
and C.M.P. No.21611 of 2019
SSV(CO)
CSR: 30.01.2020

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nithya Ravichandran v. Rohan Krishnamoorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nithya Ravichandran v. Rohan Krishnamoorthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Preyeamvadha.R Vs Sudarshan Suresh

Saravanan K. Vs Rajalakshmi

A.Nandhini Vs S.Vinoth

R.Maheshwari Vs J.Anandan

P.Shanmugasundari Vs P.Ramasundaram

P.Sudha Vs Vishwanathan