Dismissed

Dr.Anandha Arokiyaraj v. Christabel@Lalitha Christabel

Madras HC25 Apr 2019TR CMP/201/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a landlord, sought withdrawal and transfer of a pending Rent Control Appeal from Puducherry to Chennai. The Court found the appeal had been disposed of after admission of the transfer petition, rendering the transfer moot and dismissing the plea.

What did the court decide?

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition dismissed; no costs; connected civil miscellaneous petition closed.

Dr.Anandha Arokiyaraj Vs Christabel@Lalitha Christabel — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.04.2019

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ

¶4

TR.CMP.NO.201 OF 2019 AND CMP NO.6221 OF 2019

¶5

Dr.Anandha Arokiyaraj ... Petitioner Vs. Christabel @ Lalita Christabel ... Respondent

¶6

PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code to withdraw R.C.A.No.10 of 2018 on the file of the Appellate Authority Rent Control (Principal District Judge) at Puducherry and transfer the same to the Court of the Chief Small Causes Judge at Chennai or any other Court having competent jurisdiction.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.T.T.Ravichandran For Respondent : Mr.B.Balavijayan O R D E R

¶8

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is by the petitioner seeking to withdraw R.C.A.No.10 of 2018 pending on the file of the Appellate Authority Rent Controller (Principal District Judge) Puducherry and to transfer the same to the Court of the Chief Small Causes, Chennai.

¶9

The petitioner is the landlord. Due to the long pendency of the appeal, he approched this Court for transfer of Rent Control Appeal filed by him from Puducherry to any of the Rent Control Court in Chennai.

¶10

On notice, the respondent appeared through counsel and submitted a copy of the order passed in R.C.A.No.10 of 2018. It is found that the Rent Control Appeal, which is sought to be transferred, was allowed on 28.03.2019, after admission of the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication. It is open to the petitioner

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

to approach the Rent Controller for early disposal of the petition. The petitioner need not have any apprehension that the Rent Control Proceedings would be protracted. We are hopeful that the Rent Controller will dispose of the Rent Control proceedings as expeditiously as possible.

¶13

In fine, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
TK
To
1.The Appellate Authority Rent Control
(Principal District Judge)
Puducherry.
2.The Chief Judge,
Small Causes Court,
Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.B.Balavijayan, Advocate, S.R.No. 39789
TR.CMP.NO.201 OF 2019

¶15

RV(CO) GN(30/04/2019)

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.Anandha Arokiyaraj v. Christabel@Lalitha Christabel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Anandha Arokiyaraj v. Christabel@Lalitha Christabel

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Preethi Priya Vs v.Saravanan

T.v.Singaravel Vs S.Rukmani

N.P.Narmada Vs E.S.Praveenkumar

Palanivel Vs Savitha

Parameshwari Vs B.Rameshkumar

M.Vasugi Vs Samathuvam Ammal