In this Second Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 100 CPC, the Madurai Bench dismissed the appeal, up holding the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli.
The Second Appeal was dismissed without any costs being awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SA(MD). No.607 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Sixteenth day of December Two Thousand and Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN
SA(MD). No.607 of 2019
R.Kanaga (died) G.Balasubramanian(died), ... 1,2 Appellants/3,4 Plaintiffs
Vs 1. K.Rajagopal ... Respondent/Respondent/Defendant 2. R.Saraswathi 3. R.Meena 4. R.Sriram 5. Krishnaveni 6. Vignesh ... Respondents/Legal heirs of 1,2 Appellants/3,4 Plaintiffs
Prayer:- This Second Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 r/w Section 100 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.08.2015 passed in A.S.No.48 of 2013, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2013 passed in O.S.No.448 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli and allow this Second Appeal with costs.
DECREE:- This Second Appeal coming on for hearing under the provisions of Rule II of Order XLI of Schedule I of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, upon perusing the Grounds of Appeal and the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and upon hearing the arguments of MR. T.SELVAN, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Advocate for the Appeallant and Mr. N.GA.NATRAJ,Advocate for First
1/3
SA(MD). No.607 of 2019
Respondent, it is ordered and decreed that this Second Appeal be and hearby is dismissed.
Schedule of Property
ghisaq;Nfhl;il khtl;l gjptfk;> ,iz rhh;gjptfk; rufk; ghisaq;Nfhl;il tl;lk; ghisaq;Nfhl;il fpuhkk; Nkw;gb ghisaq;Nfhl;il efh; kd;wk; Nghh;L thh;lhf ,Ue;J mg;ghy; 18tJ thh;L ehsJ 20tJ thh;L ghisaq;Nfhl;il f];ghtpy; ngUkhs; fPo ujtPjpapy; fPo;rpufpy; lTz; rh;Nt thh;L 2 ,uz;L gpshf; 7 VO lTz; rh;Nt 803 vz;Z}w;wp %d;W ek;ghpy; ,Uf;Fk; efh;kd;w fjT vz;.58 cs;s kid tPl;bd; vy;ifahtJ:
tlf;Nf : godpahr;rhhp kid tPL nghJRtUf;Fk; kid Ntyp nghJr;RtUk;
fpof;Nf : nrhhpKj;J Rthkp nrl;bahh; kid Ntyp nghJr;Rth;
njw;Nf : ehuhaz rhkp tPl;L njd;tly; 2 ¾ jr;RKok; cs;s fhyp kid nghJr;Rthh;
Nkw;Nf : njd;tly; ngUkhs; fPoujtPjp
,e;j ehd;F vy;iyf;Fs;gl;lJkhd kid fpoNky; 49 ½ ehw;gj;njhd;gjiu mbAk; j.K.18k;> njd;tly; 22 ,Ugj;jp ,uz;L mbAk; j.K.8k;> cs;s 1089 rJu mb tp];jPuz kidAk; Nkw;gb kidapy; fPo;f;fz;l mstpy; ,Uf;Fk; Nkw;gb fjT vz;.58 cs;s kl;lg;gh kr;R Nghl;l tPLk; mijr; Nrh;e;j rfy fl;blk; fl;blr; rhkhd;fs; midj;Jk; Nkw;Nfhg;G tifawhf;fSk; nrg;bf; Nlq;f; ff;$Rk;> Nkw;gb tPl;by; ,izf;fg;gl;Ls;s kpd;,izg;G tahpq; rhkhd;fs; kPl;lh; nlg;ghrpl; njhifAs;gl g+uh chpikfSk; efh;kd;w Fbjz;zPh; FohAk; mjd; nlg;ghrpl; njhif cs;glg+uh chpikfSk; kw;Wk; kid tPl;ilr; Nrh;e;j rfy kh%y; ghj;jpaq;fSk; chpikfSk; midj;J <];nkz;l; iul;];fSk; cs;gl ,J g+uhTk; jgrpy; tpguk; rhp. jgrpy; nrhj;J ghisaq;Nfhl;il efh; kd;wk; vy;iyf;Fs;gl;lJ.
// True Copy //
TO
2/3
SA(MD). No.607 of 2019
Copy to:
The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies
+1 CC to Mr.N.GA.NATRAJ, Advocate ( SR-105184)
+1 CC to Mr.T.SELVAN, Advocate ( SR-105399 )
Order Dated : 16.12.2019
DECREE
SA(MD). No.607 of 2019
Dismissing the Second Appeal preferred against the judgment and decree passed in A.S. No.48 of 2013, dated 18.08.2015, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tirunelveli confirming the judgement and decree made in O.S.No.448 of 2002, dated 28.06.2013 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Tirunelveli and etc., as stated within.
JMN(03.03.2020) 3P : 7C
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal is maintainable and liable to be set aside.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Kanaga and others
K. Rajagopal and others
R. SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
