M.Tamilarasi, v. N.Somasundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal regarding a property suit for permanent injunction, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court was informed that the appellant appeared as a Judicial Officer. The court accepted the respondent's submission that the dispute had effectively ended, leading to the closure of the second appeal, costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal and connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.18 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 24.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
S.A.(MD)No.18 of 2015 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2015
M.Tamilarasi
.. Appellant/Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
N.Somasundaram
Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer : This Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.31 of 2012 dated 27.03.2013 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Kumbakonam confirming the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.250 of 2009 dated 31.07.2012 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kumbakonam.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal against the confirmation of the decree in a property suit for permanent injunction requires adjudication given the abandonment of the appeal by the appellant.
Whether the connected miscellaneous petition filed in relation to the second appeal requires further consideration.
Whether the property dispute between the parties has effectively ended due to the defendant's lack of surrounding property.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.Tamilarasi
- respondent
N.Somasundaram
Coram
P.T.Asha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court