In a second appeal regarding property possession, the Court accepted a mediation report showing a compromise. It recorded the Compromise Deed and dismissed the suit, thereby allowing the appellant's appeal.
The compromise deed was recorded; the suit in O.S.No.559 of 1993 was dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.11.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.No.912 of 2003 and C.M.P.No.9625 of 2003
Lakshmiammal ... Appellant/Respondent/Defendant .. Vs ..
Kanaga (Died) 2. D.Guanamani 3. D.Nirmala 4. D.Indira Ganthi 5. D.Jayalakshmi 6. D.Venkateswaran
[Respondents 2 to 6 are brought on record as the legal representatives of deceased sole respondent vide court order made in C.M.P.No.16895/18 in S.A.912 of 2003, dated 14.11.2018]
... Respondents/Appellants/2nd Plaintiff
Prayer :- Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 30.04.2002 made in A.S.No.18 of 2000 on the file of the Sub Court, Dharmapuri, reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.07.2000 made in O.S.No.559 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri and prays for setting aside the same.
For Appellant : Mr.C.Prabakaran For R-1 : Died For RR-2 to 6 : Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan
JUDGMENT
Both the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 6 are present. Mediation report received. The matter was compromised between the parties due to the successful mediation effort made by the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre whereby the appellant, who is
the defendant in the suit, is entitled to remain in the suit schedule properties while the respondents/plaintiffs have undertaken that they will not disturb the possession of the appellant/defendant in the suit schedule properties. Consequently, the Compromise Deed executed by both the parties is hereby recorded and the same shall form part of the record.
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Jrl To
+1c to Mr.C.Prabakaran, Advocate Sr.92970
+1cc to Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan, Advocate Sr.92426
S.A.No.912 of 2003
gj[co] srg 23/04/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compromise deed executed between the parties in the second appeal should be recorded and the suit dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshmiammal
Guanamani (D AG.N.Legas of deceased sole respondent vide court order made in C.M., No.16895),
Nirmala
Indira Ganthi
Jayalakshmi
Venkateswaran
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
