the learned counsel that no challenge has been made in the plaint with regard to the Will, despite the reply notice, has no relevance at all. When the suspicion attached to the Will is inherent in the very transaction itself irrespective of fact that the Plaintiff has not challenged such will, it is the burden of the propounder to remove such suspicious circumstance. As stated above the testator was suffered paralytic attack and he was taking treatment. He died within few hours after the registration of the Will, the manner in which his both thumb impressions was obtained clearly indicate that he was not in a fit state of mind. That apart, wrong recitals have been incorporated in the Will as if testator hands are shaking at the relevant time, therefore, he could not sign. That itself also found to be false in view of the fact that he was already paralytic attack. Hence, suspicious circumstances is inherent in the very transaction. The propounder has not removed the suspicion attached to the Will and original Will also not placed before the Court. Other beneficiaries have not propounded the Will. All these facts clearly indicated, the Will has not been proved and cannot be admitted in evidence. Therefore I do not find any error in the orders of the Courts below. The substantial
