Munusamy Udayar, v. Vanitha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.04.2019

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN

S.A.No.750 of 2006

Munusamy Udayar ...Appellant/Plaintiff

Vs.
1.Vanitha
2.Pachiammal
3.Anandan Chettiar
4.V.Sriniasan
5.V.Selvaraj
6.V.Anjali ...Respondents/Defendant
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C.,
against the decree and judgment and decree dated 30.11.2005 in
A.S.No.71 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Subordinate
Judge's Court, Tiruvannamalai dismissing the appeal against the
judgment and decree dated 29.04.2002 in O.S.No.170 of 1996 on
the file of the Additional District Munsif I, Tiruvannamalai.
For Appellant : No appearance
For RR3 : Mr.V.Prakash Babu
For R4 : Dismissed vide order dated
20.03.2018
For RR1,2,5 &6 : No appearance
*****
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for R3 present.

2.In this matter, learned counsel for the appellant had already reported no instructions and the appellant being called and remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter today i.e., on 04.04.2019, under the caption “ for dismissal”, by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called absent.