M.Murugesan v. S.Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by M. Murugesan as withdrawn after the appellant's counsel submitted that the matter was settled out of court and produced an endorsement to that effect.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :14.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.57 of 2013
M.Murugesan ... Appellant/Defendant
Vs.
1. S.Ganesan
2. S.T.Prema
3. Saraswathi
4. Karpagam ... Respondents/Plaintiffs
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the Judgment and decree made in A.S.No.16 of 2005 dated
31.10.2005 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Gudiyatham,
Vellore District reversing the judgment and decree made in
O.S.No.562 of 1992 dated 13.04.2005 on the file of the District
Munsif at Gudiyatham.
For Appellant : Ms.K.Bharathy Devi
for S.Doraiswamy
For Respondent : Mr.J.Nandagopal
for R1 to R4
JUDGMENT
Both Sides counsel present. The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the matter is settled out of court and hence she seeks permission of this Court for withdrawing the second appeal. She also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Murugesan
- respondent
S. Ganesan
- respondent
S.T. Prema
- respondent
Saraswathi
- respondent
Karpagam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court