Munusamy Gounder v. D. Easwaran
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear before the court on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 26.08.2019
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
Munusamy Gounder ...Appellant/Appellant/Defendant Vs D.Easwaran ...Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.31 of 2014 dated 09.12.2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Ranipet confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.38/2010 dated 27.09.2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court cum Judicial Magistrate Court - I, Walajapet.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Mohanamurali JUDGMENT
The notes paper in the Second Appeal reveals that the Appellant / Learned Counsel for the Appellant had been absent on 07.06.2019, 14.06.2019, 05.07.2019, 09.08.2019 and again on 21.08.2019. The matter was also posted under the caption 'For Dismissal', on the above dates.
- Again today i.e., 26.08.2019, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-III) //True Copy//
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Munusamy Gounder
- respondent
D. Easwaran
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court