Tharabai v. Munirathinammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default due to absence of appellants after counsel reported no instructions. No costs.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal was dismissed for default. No costs awarded.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 11.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.1899 of 2000
- Tharabai
2. Chandradhayan
3. Chandramouli
4. Sankar Ganesh
5. Saravanan
6. Chandra Kumar
7. Saraswathy (minor)
(rep by her mother and guardian
the 1st appellant)
8. Jayaraman ... Appellants
Vs.
1. Munirathinammal
2. Anburaj ... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the Judgment and decree dated 19.07.2000 and made in A.S.No.126
of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge,
Tiruvannamalai, reversing the judgment and decree dated
28.07.1999 and made in O.S.No.873 of 1991 on the file of the
Principal District Munsif, Tiruvannamalai.
For Appellants : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
For Respondents : R1 and R2 set exparte
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo stating that he is reporting no instructions for the appellants. Memo recorded. The appellants called absent. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tharabai and others
- respondent
Munirathinammal and Anburaj
Coram
P. Rajamannikam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court