Dhanalakshmi v. P.Muthuswamy
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the second appeal as withdrawn by the appellant after accepting her counsel's memo stating the matter was compromised between the parties.
What did the court decide?
The second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1818 of 2002 and C.M.P.NO. 1865 of 2019
Dhanalakshmi ...Appellant/Appellant/Third Party -VsP.Muthuswamy ...Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree of the Principal District Judge's Court at Coimbatore dated 16.07.2002 in A.S.No.14/2002 confirming the judgment and decree of the III Additional District Munsif Court at Coimbatore dated 22.03.2001 in O.S.No.3758 of 1996. For Appellant : M/s.Mythili Suresh for M/s. Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondent : No appearance JUDGMENT
Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating that the matter has been compromised between the parties accordingly seeks permission to withdraw the second appeal. The memo is taken on record.
- In the light of the above position, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. bga Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
P. Muthuswamy
Coram
T. Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court