N.Subramaniyan v. C.Kannan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal, both sides appeared absent. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution without costs and closed any connected petitions.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; No costs; Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1525 of 2007
- N.Subramaniyan 2. N. Kanniyappan ... Appellants
Vs. 1. C.Kannan 2. C.Sagadevan ... Respondents
Prayer:
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the Sub Court, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District, dated 02.03.2006 made in A.S.No.4 of 2005 confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif at Arni, Tiruvannamalai District, dated 22.07.2004 in O.S.No.208 of 2000.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance JUDGMENT
For Respondents : No appearance
In this matter, counsel for the appellants had already reported "no instructions". The appellants on being called and remaining absent, the registry was directed to list the matter on 23.04.2019 under the caption “for dismissal” by printing the name of the appellants in the cause list.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.Subramaniyan, N. Kanniyappan
- respondent
C.Kannan, C.Sagadevan
Coram
T.RAVINDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court