Vs Devisigamani(Died)*
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second appeal and permitted its withdrawal after finding no justification for granting liberty to the appellant to file a fresh suit.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal was permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.1393 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
- S.A.No.1393 of 2001 and
- C.M.P.Nos.7508 and 16461 of 2019
- Velmurugan ... Appellant / Plaintiff .. Vs ..
- Deivasigamani (Deceased) 2. Rogusamy 3. Thangaraj 4. Palanisamy 5. Ponnusamy 6. D.Pongiyammal 7. D.Varanavasai
[RR-6 and 7 brought on record as LRs. of the deceased R.1 vide order of Court dated 03.08.2018 made in C.M.P.10511 to 10513 of 2018 in S.A.No.1393 of 2001] ... Respondents
Prayer :- Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 15.03.2000 made in A.S.No.198 of 1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Erode, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.07.1999 made in
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to liberty to file a fresh suit instead of withdrawing the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Velmurugan
- respondent
Deivasigamani
- respondent
Rogusamy
- respondent
Thangaraj
- respondent
Palanisamy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court