Second Appeal disposed of upon filing and recording of a joint compromise memo by the parties. Connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs awarded. Compromise forms part of the decree.
The appeal disposed of as per terms of recorded compromise; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA
SA.No.125 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
1.C.Balasubramanian
2.C.Chinnayan ... Appellants
vs.
M.Sakunthala ... Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the decree and Judgment dated
21.08.2009 passed in A.S.No.11 of 2009 on the file of the
Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai partly reversing
the decree and Judgment dated 14.11.2008 passed in O.S.No.347
of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court,
Mayiladuthurai.
For Appellants : N.S.Sivakumar
For Respondent : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran
J U D G M E N T
A joint memo of compromise is filed by both the
parties in the present appeal. All the parties to the
compromise memo are present before this Court and they accept
the terms of compromise in the memo and the compromise memo is
hereby recorded.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
SA.No.125 of 2010
and
M.P.No.1 of 2010
TM(CO)
GMY(24/02/2020)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. Balasubramanian and C. Chinnayan
M. Sakunthala
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
