Senthilkumar v. v.Balakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC dismissed as settled out of court upon the appellant's representation and endorsement, resulting in closure of connected petitions.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as settled out of court with no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :18.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
S.A.No.1077 of 2019 and CMP.Nos.23378 and 23379 of 2019
Senthilkumar ... Appellant/ Plaintiff Vs. V.Balakrishnan ... Respondent/ Defendant
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree of the learned Principle District Judge, Namakkal dated 18.03.2019 made in A.S.No.23 of 2017 reversing that of the Subordinate Judge, Namakkal dated 10.04.2017 made in O.S.No.181 of 2008.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Saravanakumar
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to dismiss this case as settled out of court and he has also made an endorsement in this regard which reads as follows:
“ The above S.A is settled out of Court and it is requested for return of court fees and dismissed as settled out of court”
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Senthilkumar
- respondent
V.Balakrishnan
Coram
P.Rajamanickam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court