The High Court of Madras dismissed a Review Application for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the Court despite the case being listed.
The Review Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.07.2019
CORUM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
Review Application No.211 of 2013
in W.P.No.28763 of 2011
A.Caliamorthy
.... Petitioner
Vs
1. Union of India
rep. by the Govt. of Puducherry
through the Director of Health and
Family Welfare Services, Saram,
Puducherry.
2. Lion. S
3. V.Rajalakshmi
4. Sandanavathy
5. Mathivanan.S
6. Jaganathan
7. Visalatchy.P
8. The Registrar,
Central Administrative Tribunal,
Madras.
.... Respondents
REVIEW filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India read with Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Civil Procedure Code to review the order dated 21.12.2012 in W.P.No.28763 of 2011
2
K.K.SASIDHARAN,J. AND P.T.ASHA,J.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.Syed Mustafa, AGP(P)
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.,)
None appears for the petitioner, even though the name of the petitioner is printed in the cause list. Hence, this Review Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. ( K.K.SASIDHARAN,J) (P.T.ASHA,J) 09.07.2019 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No sl To
Review Application No.211 of 2013 in W.P.No.28763 of 2011
3 provisions across 2 enactments
A.Caliamorthy
Union of India rep. by the Govt. of Puducherry through the Director of Health and Family Welfare Services, Saram, Puducherry
Lion. S
V.Rajalakshmi
Sandanavathy
Mathivanan.S
K.K.SASIDHARAN
P.T.ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
