Three original petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear during the hearing. The pending years suggested no purpose in keeping the petitions pending.
Original Petitions dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Original Petition Nos.83,87 and 88 of 2011
P.S.Thiyagarajan .. Petitioner in above O.Ps Vs.
1.Surendra Kumar Ranka.
Common Prayer: Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the arbitral Award dated 09.12.2010 passed by the Learned Arbitrator/2nd respondent in Arb.O.P.No. unnumbered of 2008.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.P.Pooja for M/s.Giridhar and Sai Associates.
COMMON ORDER
The above original petitions are filed to set aside the arbitral
Award dated 09.12.2010 passed by the Learned Arbitrator/2nd respondent in Arb.O.P.No. unnumbered of 2008.
2
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
msv
there is no representation for the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was passed over. Even when the matter was called after 11.35 a.m, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the above original petitions pending. Accordingly, the above Original Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
08.07.2019
msv
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order: Non-speaking order
Original Petition Nos.83,87 and 88 of 2011
P.S.Thiyagarajan
1.Surendra Kumar Ranka
2. Thiru.R.G.Ramaiah
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
