Disposed

Mr.Sherif Dyan, v. M/s.Citilights Properties

Madras HC30 Oct 2019OP/700/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two Original Petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to set aside an arbitral award. The court accepted a Memo of Compromise signed by all parties on 17.10.2019 and ordered the petitions disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018 disposed of in terms of the Memo of Compromise dated 17.10.2019.

Mr.Sherif Dyan, Vs M/s.Citilights Properties — Arbitration | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 30.10.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶6

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018

¶7

1.Sherif Dyan 2.M/s.Sherdan Games Park & Holidays Private Limited, No.22, 2^nd Lane Beach, First Floor, Chennai 600 001.

¶8

... Petitioners in O.P.No.700 of 2017

¶9

M/s.Citilights Properties Private Limited, Represented by its Chief Operating Officer Mr.R.Sathyan, No.1, Vivekananda Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 034.

¶10

... Petitioner in O.P.No.134 of 2018

¶11

vs.

¶12

M/s.Citilights Properties Private Limited, Represented by its Chief Operating Officer Mr.R.Sathyan, No.1, Vivekananda Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 034.

¶13

... Respondent in O.P.No.700 of 2017

¶14

1.Sherif Dyan

¶15

2.M/s.Sherdan Games Park & Holidays Private Limited, No.22, 2^nd Lane Beach, First Floor, Chennai 600 001.

¶16

... Respondents in O.P.No.134 of 2018

¶17

PRAYER in O.P.No.700 of 2017 : This Original petition has been filed under

¶18

Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 pleased to partly set

¶19

1/4

¶20

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶21

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018

¶22

aside the award dated 06.01.2017 passed by the learned Arbitrator, to the extent as indicated in the grounds.

¶23

PRAYER in O.P.No.134 of 2018 : This Original petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 pleased to set aside the award dated 06.01.2017 and order in I.A.No.1 of 2017 dated 30.03.2017

¶24

passed by the learned Arbitrator, to the extent as indicated in the grounds of

¶25

petition.
For Petitioners : M/s.S.Umapathy
in O.P.No.134 of 2018
Mr.G.Balasubramanian
in O.P.No.700 of 2017
For Respondents : Mr.G.Balasubramanian
for M/s.Leela & Co.,
in O.P.No.134 of 2018
M/s.S.Umapathy
in O.P.No.700 of 2017
C O M M O N O R D E R

¶26

The learned counsel for the respondent in O.P.No.134 of 2018 submitted that the parties entered into the Memo of Compromise dated 17.10.2019

¶27

whereby the disputes were settled amicably. In this regard, he referred to the said Memo of Compromise which is available on record. On considering the

¶28

2/4

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶30

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018

¶31

submissions of the learned counsel for the respondent and upon examining the Memo of Compromise dated 17.10.2019, it is clear that the disputes relating to both O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018 have been fully settled as per the terms of the said Memo of Compromise, which is signed by all the parties to the litigation.

¶32

2.Accordingly, O.P.Nos.134 of 2018 and 700 of 2017 are disposed of in
terms of the said Memo of Compromise, which shall form a part of the order.
30.10.2019
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
rna

¶33

3/4

¶34

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶35

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017 and 134 of 2018

¶36

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J

¶37

rna

¶38

O.P.Nos.700 of 2017
and 134 of 2018
30.10.2019

¶39

4/4

¶40

http://www.judis.nic.in

Mr.Sherif Dyan, v. M/s.Citilights Properties

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.Sherif Dyan, v. M/s.Citilights Properties

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and The Recovery Officer Vs The Official Liquidator

The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Vs the Official Liquidator

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs M/s Suryadeo Alloys and Power Pvt.Ltd

Chennai Port Trust Vs M/S. T. Arumaidurai and Co.

The Official Liquidator Vs Sri Murugesan Emanuel

D.Nandha Kumar Vs H.Anraj( Deceased)