Allowed

K.Ramesh v. No Respondent

Madras HC27 Aug 2019OP/393/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted a succession certificate to K. Ramesh, the sole son, to collect debts and interest in respect of his mother M.S. Sakunthala's intestate estate. The court noted the husband's predecease and relied on the legal heirship certificate.

What did the court decide?

Succession certificate granted to the petitioner to collect debts and interest in respect of the securities listed in the schedule.

K.Ramesh Vs No Respondent — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN O.P.No.393 of 2019

¶3

In the matter of the Indian
Succession Act XXXIX of 1925
and
In the matter of Certain debts
in respect of M.S.Sakunthala
deceased intestate.
K.RAMESH,
S/o.Late M.S.Sakunthala,
3/1, First Street, Rangarajapuram,
Kodambakkam, Chennai-600024. ..Petitioner
Original Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be
pleased that a succession certificate may be granted to the
petitioner with power to collect the debts and to receive
the interest specified in the schedule.
SCHEDULE-Debts
S.No. Name of debtor Amount of debt, Description and date of
including interest, on date instrument, if any by
of application for which the debt is secured
extension
1 The Asst.Post Master, Rs. 40,000/- A/c.No.36092
SB-1, T.Nagar, Head
Post Office, T.Nagar.
Chennai-17.
2 -do- Rs.60,611/- A/c.No.33127
3 -do- Rs.90,000/- A/c.No.232835
4 -do- Rs.1,00,000/- A/c.No.102263
Total Rs.2,90,611/-

¶4

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ This Original Petition coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:

¶5

¶6

The petitioner seeks issuance of Succession Certificate in respect of the securities that stood in the name of M.S.Sakunthala who died intestate on 25.02.2009.

¶7

The petitioner is the only son of the deceased. Her husband had pre-deceased her. The petitioner has examined himself as PW1. He has produced the death certificate of the deceased M.S.Sakunthala as Ex.P1 and the legal heirship certificate as Ex.P2. A perusal of Ex.P2 shows that the petitioner alone is the legal heir of the deceased M.S.Sakunthala. It also discloses that her husband pre-

¶8

deceased her.

¶9

petitioner is entitled to Succession Certificate in respect of the securities mentioned in the schedule to the petition.

¶10

granting Succession Certificate in respect of the securities mentioned in the petition in favour of the petitioner.

¶11

//Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the th day of 2019.

¶12

Su/12.09.2019 COURT OFFICER

¶13

From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Ramesh v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Ramesh v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.R.Gopu Vs J.Swamidoss

Tmt.K.Chitra Vs v.Kannan and Another

Bhuvaneswari Vs No Respondent

K.Madusudhan Vs No Respondent

Exertion Technology Private Limited Vs Mrs.N.Sharadha

g.paul pandian Vs a.v.Radhakrishnan