N.Mohamed Zackriah v. Rafeeq Trsut
Case brief
What is this about?
Modification of an order regarding court fee refund where the petitioner's immobility necessitated transfer to counsel instead of the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to refund court fee to counsel upon acknowledgment by counsel
What the court decided
C.S.No.403 of 2019 in O.A.No.636 of 2019
C.S.No.403 of 2019 and
O.A.No.636 of 2019
R.SUBRAMANIAN.J.,
Today, this matter has been listed under the caption 'for being
mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel.
- While ordering refund of court fee on 16.07.2019, the
Registry was directed to refund the entire court fee by issuing cheque
in the name of the 1st plaintiff with a direction that the cheque should
be handed over to the counsel for the plaintiff.
refund of court fee and the amount is credited to the account of the
plaintiff by NEFT transfer. The procedure involved in such transfer requires the plaintiff to appear before the concerned Officer and sign
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order directing refund of court fee to the petitioner via NEFT can be modified due to his immobility
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1st plaintiff
- respondent
M/s. Aiyar and Dolia
Coram
R.SUBRAMANIAN J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court