Plaintiff counsel sought permission to withdraw the civil suit. The High Court dismissed the suit as withdrawn without awarding costs.
Civil suit dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
Tr.C.S.No.247 of 2012 1.N.Prabu Raj 2.N.Swarnalatha 3.S.Vidyalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs. 1.R.Sudharsanam 2.Sinna Alagappan Chettiar 3.R.Nithiyananthan 4.R.Sivananthan 5.R.Yogarani 6.R.Sugunavadhi ... Respondents PRAYER: Plaint under Order VII Rule 1 CPC praying for (a) declaration that the plaintiffs are entitled to suit property and direct the defendants 1 and 2 to deliver possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs; (b) cancel the sale deed executed by the father of 1st defendant in favour of 2nd defendant dated 22.12.67 and registered as document No.4859 of 1967 registered at SRO, Saidapet now in the jurisdiction of SRO, Adyar; (c) Grant cost of the suit.
For Petitioners : Mr.G.B.Sabaridas for P1 &P2 Mr.R.Subramanian for P3
2
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J,
rri
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw this Civil Suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
N.Prabu Raj
N.Swarnalatha
S.Vidyalakshmi
R.Sudharsanam
Sinna Alagappan Chettiar
R.Nithiyananthan
PUSHPA SATHYNARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
