The Single Judge Bench dismissed six Civil Revision Petitions and connected Miscellaneous Petitions as infructuous based on counsel's endorsement regarding subsequent developments, without adjudicating the merits.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous; connected civil miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2003 and C.M.P.Nos.11344,11345,1346,11347,11348 & 11349 of 2003
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners have made an endorsement to the effect that the civil revision petitions have become infructuous, in view of the subsequent developments.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for
the petitioners, revision petitions are dismissed as
infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected civil
miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (Insp.Cell)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nsd
To
The XIV Assistant City Civil Judge
Madras.
copy to: The Section Officer,
VR Section, High Court, Madras.
C.R.P.(NPD).Nos.1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1075 & 1076 of 2003
and
C.M.P.Nos.11344,11345,1346,11347,11348 & 11349 of 2003
SSV(CO)
SSM(12/06/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs.N.Brindavathy
Nagamuthu
Mrs.Meena R.Patel
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
