Ganesan, v. Blessan
Case brief
What is this about?
This order allows a civil revision petition challenging the return of an application for stay of execution proceedings. The High Court directed the District Munsif Court to number the application and decide it on merits.
What did the court decide?
Office directed to number the application for stay and decide it on merits after hearing both parties.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.695 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE: 21.10.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.695 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD).No.3871 of 2019
1.Ganesan
2.Murugan ... Petitioners/Petitioners Respondents/Defendants
-Vs-
Blessan ... Respondent/Respondent Petitioner/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 28.01.2019 passed in unnumbered E.A.SR.No.406 of 2019 in E.P.No.32 of 2018 in O.S.No.190 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Srivaikundam.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a court office can return an application for stay on the ground of no reasons adduced without deciding the application.
Whether it is for the Court to decide if sufficient reasons for stay of execution proceedings are adduced.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganesan
- petitioner
Murugan
- respondent
Blessan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court