Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 praying to set aside an ex parte order. Petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.03.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN
Vivekanandan .. Petitioner / 3rd party
Vs.
3.Srinivasan .. 3rd Respondent/ Petitioner / Auction Purchaser
Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to call for the records of unnumbered E.A.No.NIL of 2019 in E.P.No.6 of 2008 in O.S.No.64 of 2003 dated 07.01.2019, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Melur Taluk and set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.Eanesy De Prakash for Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
2
PJL
To
The District Munsif, Melur Taluk.
C.R.P(MD)No.429 of 2019
DS/ /SAR- (05.04.2019) 2P 2C
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivekanandan
3. Srinivasan
R. Pongiappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
