Dismissed

P.Ramachandran, v. Shri Vanamamali Mutt at Nanguneri, Rep.by its

Madras HC16 Dec 2019CRP(MD)/2171/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice R. Tharani dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 challenging the reconstruction of a civil suit file, finding the petition infructuous as the record had already been reconstructed by the Subordinate Judge.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.

P.Ramachandran, Vs Shri Vanamamali Mutt at… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 16.12.2019 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI C.R.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.11374 of 2019

¶4

P.Ramachandran

¶5

.. Petitioner/Respondent No.4/ Defendant 4

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.Sri Vanamamali Mutt at Nanguneri, Represented by its Madadhipathy, His Holiness Shri Vanamamalai, Ramanuja Jeer Swamigal of Vanamamalai Mutt through his power of attorney agent G.Satagopan S/o.Govinda Iyengar, No.6,Nanguneri Taluk. ..Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶8

2.L.Venkatesan

¶9

3.H.Ramachandra Babu 4.Narayana Iyengar .. Respondents/Respondents/ Defendant 1 to 4

¶10

Prayer : This Civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Madurai to reconstruct the plaint and decree of O.S.No.130 of 1996 in E.P.No.164 of 2011 based on the memo recorded by Subordinate Judge, Madurai dated 13.08.2019.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.V.Ramakrishnan

¶12

ORDER

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side.

¶14

2.This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to reconstruct the plaint and decree of O.S.No.130 of 1996 in E.P.No.164 of 2011 based on the memo recorded by Subordinate Judge, Madurai dated 13.08.2019.

¶15

3.A perusal of the report from the learned I Additional Sub https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Judge, Madurai received by this Court reveals that the bundle was

¶16

1/2

¶17

C.R.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2019

¶18

already reconstructed. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶20

// True Copy //

¶21

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

MRN

¶23

¶24

The Subordinate Judge, Madurai.

¶25

+1 CC to MR.V.RAMAKRISHNAN, Advocate ( SR-105358[F] dated 17/12/2019 )

¶26

+1 CC to MR.T.LAJAPATHIROY, Advocate ( SR-105458[F] dated 17/12/2019 )

¶27

C.R.P.(MD)No.2171 of 2019 16.12.2019

¶28

KM/(09.01.2020) 2P 4C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

P.Ramachandran, v. Shri Vanamamali Mutt at Nanguneri, Rep.by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ramachandran, v. Shri Vanamamali Mutt at Nanguneri, Rep.by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Veerabathran @ Sivanesan Vs a.C.Manavalan

J.Vincent Vs J.Jayaseela Royan

Vijaya Alias Vijayalakshmi Vs Poosari

R.Jeyaram Dass Vs M.Vijaya

S.Parameswaran Alias Poulose (Died) Vs K.Jayachandran

Dr.N.Vidyasagar, Vs Moonrumanthai 84 Oor Soliya