The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC as infructuous, noting that nothing remains for consideration, and consequently dismissed the connected miscellaneous petition.
Civil Revision Petition and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1978 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.10.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1978 of 2013
and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013
Kaliyamoorthy ... Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant
Vs. Venkatesan ...Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Order made in E.P.No.34 of 2007 in O.S.No.73 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Judge, Pattukottai dated 07.08.2013.
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for consideration in this petition. In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Assistant Registrar(CO)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
CM
TO
The Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai.
C.R.P.(NPD) (MD) No.1978 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 30.10.2019
TR(25.11.2019) 1P 2C
1/1
Kaliyamoorthy
Venkatesan
P.T.Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
