Dismissed

R.M.P.L.Meenakshi Achi v. P.Sakunthalai

Madras HC17 Dec 2019CRP(MD)/1970/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this revision petition under Article 227, the Court rejected the petitioner's undertaking to vacate in one year and instead directed her to vacate the premises within three months of the order's receipt. The revision petition seeking to quash the lower appellate authority's order allowing more time was dismissed, and the matter was closed.

What did the court decide?

Directed to vacate the premises within three months from the date of receipt of the order.

R.M.P.L.Meenakshi Achi Vs P.Sakunthalai — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1970 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Date : 17.12.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1970 of 2019

¶6

and C.M.P.(MD)No.10122 of 2019

¶7

R.M.P.L.Meenakshi Achi ... Petitioner/Petitioner/Appellant Vs.

¶8

P.Sakunthalai ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent

¶9

Prayer : This Civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order, dated 06.08.2019 passed in I.A.No.87 of 2019 in R.C.A.No.32 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Madurai, and allow the present Civil Revision Petition.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Nagendran For Respondent : Mr.N.Ponniah

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition has been filed to quash the order passed in I.A.No.87 of 2019 in R.C.A.No.32 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Madurai.

¶13

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner filed an undertaking affidavit before this Court that she will vacate the premises and hand over the key after one year time i.e., on 01.12.2020.

¶14

3.The learned counsel for the respondent strongly opposed to give further period of time to the petitioner to vacate the premises.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to vacate the premises within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶16

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar (Records)

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶21

¶22

1.The Principal Sub Judge(Rent Control Appellate Authority,Madurai. 2.The Record Keeper,Vernacular Section,(2 copies)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

¶24

+1 CC to M/s.M.PONNIAH, Advocate ( SR-105306[F] dated 17/12/2019 )

¶25

dss/sma/20/1/2020/1p/5c

¶26

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.1970 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD)No.10122 of 2019 17.12.2019

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

1/1

R.M.P.L.Meenakshi Achi v. P.Sakunthalai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.M.P.L.Meenakshi Achi v. P.Sakunthalai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Jeyaram Dass Vs M.Vijaya

S.Parameswaran Alias Poulose (Died) Vs K.Jayachandran

Dr.N.Vidyasagar, Vs Moonrumanthai 84 Oor Soliya

Meiyammai @ Sakila Vs Subramanian @ Sridhar

Trec-Step Vs K.Vadivel

K. Jeyapaul Vs Helandevika, W/O.K.Jeyapaul