Civil revision petition filed by the wife against an interim custody order was dismissed as it was treated as no longer pressed following a compromise between parties.
No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1610 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
D.Uma Maheshwari .. Petitioner/Respondent/ Respondent
Vs.
N.Thirunavakarasu .. Respondent/Petitioner/ Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the petition and orders passed in I.A.No.5 of 2011 in G.W.O.P.No.3 of 2011 on the file of District and Sessions Court, Thoothukudi, dated 16.06.2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.P.Senthil
For Respondent : Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu
ORDER
This civil revision petition appears to be filed by the wife as against the order of interim custody.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the matter is compromised between the parties and nothing survives for adjudication in this case.
3.In view of the same, this civil revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar()
1/2
C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1610 of 2011
To
1.The Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi. 2.The Section Officer,( 2 COPIES) E.R/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.1610 of 2011 20.08.2019
TM MS/18.09.2019/2P.4C
2/2
D.Uma Maheshwari
N.Thirunavakarasu
S.S.Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
