A.Sendurkani @ Jesukani v. Arulraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a civil revision petition filed to challenge the rejection of an application for child custody enforcement. Due to the petitioner's inability to locate minor children and loss of interest in custody after a long delay, the Court directed the Principal District Judge to dispose of the main writ petition within three months to render substantial justice.
What did the court decide?
Directing the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin, to dispose of G.W.O.P.No.24 of 2010 within three months; civil revision petition disposed of.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.1366 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.1366 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011
A.Sendurkani @ Jesukani .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Arulraj .. Respondent/Respondent/Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the docket order, dated 12.11.2010 passed in unnumbered I.A.No.Sr.7084 of 2010 in G.W.O.P.No.24 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Thoothukudi.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar
For Respondent : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition maintaining the return of an interlocutory application on grounds of maintainability should be disposed of in light of changed circumstances regarding minor childre
Whether the trial court should be directed to dispose of the underlying writ petition subject within a specific timeframe to ensure substantial justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sendurkani @ Jesukani
- respondent
Arulraj
Coram
S.S. Sundar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court