The petitioner in a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India sought to withdraw the petition. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1303 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.08.2019
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
Sekar
:Petitioner
vs.
1.Rajalakshmi 2.Minor Priyanka 3.Minor Sruthika :Respondents (Minor respondents are represented by their Natural Guardian and Mother, the first respondent)
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order in I.A.No.55 of 2010 in H.M.O.P.No.23 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sivakasi, dated 22.03.2011.
For Respondents :No appearance
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. The learned Counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side)
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
1/2
C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1303 of 2011
To
The Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi.
C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.1303 of 2011
07.08.2019
cmr JMN(19.08.2019) 2P : 2C
2/2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sekar
Rajalakshmi
Priyanka
Sruthika
S.S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
