Petitioner sought direction for expeditious disposal of a pending rent revision petition under case flow management rules. Court directed lower court to decide within 3 months issuing notice to lower court while dispensing notice to respondents.
Direction to dispose RCOP.No. 12 of 2014 within three months of receipt of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P(MD)No.1161 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.10.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.R.P(MD)No.1161 of 2019
1.A. Mumthaj Begam 2.Mumthaj Begam through power agent M.S.Mohammed Siddique
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.P. Thangamani 2.P.krishnasamy 3.P.Krishnamoorthy 4.P.Radhakrishnan
5.P.Thangaraj
... Respondents
PRAYER : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to direct the Additional Subordinate Court, Kumbakonam to dispose the RCOP.No. 12 of 2014, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court – Cum – Rent Controller, Kumbakonam within a time stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr. G. Gomathi Sankar
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed for issuing a direction to dispose the RCOP.No. 12 of 2014, pending on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court – Cum – Rent Controller, Kumbakonam, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
1/2
C.R.P(MD)No.1161 of 2019
Association, Tamil Nadu Vs. Union of India), the learned counsel contended that RCOP must be disposed of within a period of 9 months from the date of filing.
accordingly. No costs.
Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
trp
To
The Principal District Munsif
Cum – Rent Controller, Kumbakonam.
+2 CC to M/s.G.GOMATHI SANKAR, Advocate SR-94026 & 94445.
C.R.P(MD)No.1161 of 2019 23.10.2019
CS(20.11.2019) 2P 4C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the District Munsif Court should be directed to dispose of the pending revision under case flow management rules.
Whether notice to respondents is necessary for issuing a direction for expeditious disposal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P(Civil).No. 496 of 2002, Salem Advocates Bar Association, Tamil Nadu Vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶19
2 provisions across 2 enactments
1.A. Mumthaj Begam 2.Mumthaj Begam
1.P. Thangamani 2.P.krishnasamy 3.P.Krishnamoorthy 4.P.Radhakrishnan 5.P.Thangaraj
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
