C.Mayan v. a.M.Sivanandi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel recorded the settlement reached out of court.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 29.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
1.C.Mayan 2.K.Ukkirapandiyan 3.P.Murugasen 4.M.Pitchaimani
Vs.
1.A.M.Sivanandi 2.V.Sudhakaran .. Respondents/Plaintiffs
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to struck of the plaint in O.S.No.55 of 2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Periyakulam, from the file.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondents : Mr.R.Suriyanarayanan
ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, since the matter has been settled out of the Court and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Mayan
- petitioner
K.Ukkirapandiyan
- petitioner
P.Murugasen
- petitioner
M.Pitchaimani
- respondent
A.M.Sivanandi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court