A.Danabal v. Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.967 of 2009
A.Dhanabal ... Petitioner/ decree Holder
Vs.
1.N.Ramachandran 2.G.Munisamy Pillai 3.Thaiyalnayaki 4.Janamajayam 5.Kannagi
6.Dhasadharaman
7.Renuka 8.Eralikesavan ... Respondents/Judgment Debtor
Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the common order and decreetal order dated 07.06.2007 made in E.A.No.113 of 2006 in E.P.No.88 of 2003 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Puducherry.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.P.Manoharan For Respondents : Mr.V.Raghavachari (R2) R1, R3 to R8 – no ready in notice O R D E R
When the matter was listed for hearing on 13.03.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the sole petitioner had died and sought time for taking steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole petitioner. Subsequently, the matter has been listed periodically for taking steps. However, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner. In these circumstances, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Dhanabal
- respondent
N. Ramachandran
- respondent
G. Munisamy Pillai
- respondent
Thaiyalnayaki
- respondent
Janamajayam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court