Madhupriya v. S.Premananth
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition deemed infructuous upon endorsement by counsel; connected miscellaneous petitions also dismissed without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
What the court decided
C.R.P. (PD) No. 617 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR
C.R.P. (PD) No. 617 of 2019 and
C.M.P. Nos. 21327 and 4125 of 2019
P. Madhurapriya ... Petitioner
-Vs-
S. Premananth ... Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the docket order made in Memo in S.R. No. 9722 of 2018 in H.M.O.P. No. 465 of 2016 dated 23.0.2019 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Tambaram.
For Petitioner : Ms. P. Srividya
For Respondent : Ms. Periasamy Rose Kamalam
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Madhurapriya
- respondent
S. Premananth
Coram
R. Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court