Raju v. Kalaimani
Case brief
What is this about?
On a complaint that the underlying civil suit was disposed of by compromise, the Court held the Civil Revision Petition to be infructuous and dismissed it, closing the connected petition.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.11.2019
CORAM :
The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.No.5201 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
Raju ... Petitioner
Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 12.03.2011 passed in I.A.No.94 of 2011 in O.S.No.275 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif, Sankarapuram.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Logesh for M/s.N.Ramesh
For Respondent : Not ready in notice
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the suit in O.S.No.275 of 2009 itself has been disposed of by the trial Court based on the compromise entered into between the parties, therefore, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition is infructuous having been filed against an order that has been disposed of by a compromise.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju
- respondent
District Munsif, Sankarapuram
Coram
M. Duraiswamy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court