A civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear despite multiple listings. No representation was filed on the date of hearing, and the court inferred a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(PD)No.4726 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP(PD)No.4726 of 2014
S.Vijayakumar ...Petitioner
vs.
1.Purusthothaman
2.Kesavalu
3.Rajamoorthy
4.Tamil Nadu Government
Represented by its
District Collector,
Nagapattinam.
5.The Sub-Collector,
Mayiladuthurai.
6.The Tahsildar,
Mayiladuthurai.
7.The Assistant Director of Agriculture,
Mayiladuthurai. ...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to allow this revision petition and set aside the Order passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai in I.A.No.111 of 2014 in O.S.No.297 of 2013 dated 14th day of July 2014.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaradoss for R1 to R3
for M/s.V.Chandrasekaran Mr.N.Manikandan, for R4 to R7 Government Advocate
CRP(PD)No.4726 of 2014
ORDER
The matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal” today.
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.4 to 7 are present. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last two occasions on 07.06.2019 and 19.07.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now
be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this
revision petition. 2.Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for
default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
29.07.2019
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order pam
CRP(PD)No.4726 of 2014
To
CRP(PD)No.4726 of 2014
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
pam
C.R.P.(PD)No.4726 of 2014
29.07.2019
S. Vijayakumar
Purusthothaman
Kesavalu
Rajamoorthy
Tamil Nadu Government
The Sub-Collector, Mayiladuthurai
Abdul Quddhoose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
