The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for non-prosecution when the petitioner failed to appear or provide representation during the hearing dates on 18.02.2019 and 20.02.2019.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.4016 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
K.Mohankumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Shriram City Union Finance Limited,
Rep. By its Authorized Signatory,
416-C, N.S.R.Road, Saibaba Colony,
Coimbatore-641 011.
2.R.Vijaya
3.S.Saleem ... Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed by the Hon'ble Principal District Judge, Coimbatore on 05.08.2011 in E.P.No.377/2011 in SCUF.AC.No.1359/2009.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
When the case was taken up for hearing on 18.02.2019, there
was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the case was
http://www.judis.nic.in directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal" on 19.02.2019.
2
C.SARAVANAN,J.
jen
On 19.02.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time, therefore this case was listed under the same caption today i.e 20.02.2019. Even today, there is no representation for the Petitioner.
2.Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
20.02.2019
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
jen
To
The Principal District Judge,
Coimbatore.
C.R.P.(PD).No.4016 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
K.Mohankumar
Shriram City Union Finance Limited
R.Vijaya
S.Saleem
C.Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
