The Court determined that a Civil Revision Petition seeking strike-off of a plaint was infructuous due to counsel's concession. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD) No.3621 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.3621 of 2014
and
M.P. No.1 of 2014
1. Narashiman
2. Jaganmurthy
3. Kavitha ... Petitioners
Vs
Jai Rajeshkumar .... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
India, to strike off the plaint in O.S. No.175 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tindivanam and thereby allow the Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.N. Suresh
ORDER
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that
the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. The learned
counsel for the petitioners has also made an endorsement to that
1/2
CRP (PD) No.3621 of 2014
vsi2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
20.08.2019
Index: Yes/ No
Internet: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order
vsi2
To
The Principal District Munsif,
Tindivanam.
CRP (PD) No.3621 of 2014
2/2
Narashiman and others
Jai Rajeshkumar
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
