Sujatha v. S.Gowri
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging an interim order allowing plaintiffs to admit documents in a suit where an ex parte decree had been set aside. The court held evidentiary issues regarding document authenticity and impost duties are for the trial court.
What did the court decide?
The civil revision petition was dismissed; no costs awarded; the connected miscellaneous petition was also dismissed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD).No.3533 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
C.R.P.(PD) No.3533 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.23189 of 2019
Sujatha ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Gowri
2.Rupesh Dev (Minor)
3.Sanjeev Dev (Minor)
(RR 2 and 3 are represented by their
guardian and mother S.Gowri (1st Respondent)
... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the Fair and Decretal orders dated 13.03.2017 passed in I.A.No.8 of 2017 in O.S.No.11 of 2010 on the file of Sub Court, Poonamallee.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.No.8 of 2017 in O.S.No.11 of 2010 on the file of Sub
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the lower court erred in allowing the plaintiffs to mark documents sought to be introduced before the commencement of trial despite the petitioner's objection regarding their authenticity and
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sujatha
- respondent
S. Gowri
- respondent
Rupesh Dev (Minor)
- respondent
Sanjeev Dev (Minor)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court