The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The court observed that the petitioner failed to appear and repeatedly sought adjournments, inferring a lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD) No.3408 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRP (PD)No.3408 of 2014
and
MP No.1 of 2014
Chinna Gounder ... Petitioner
Vs
1. S. Sukri @ Kozhandasami
2.S.Arokiasamy .... Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and final order passed in I.A. No.931 of 2014 in O.S. No.308 of 2007 dated 8.8.2014, on the file of District Munsif Court, Sankagiri and allow the Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : No appearance
ORDER
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 06.08.2019, there was no
1/3
CRP (PD) No.3408 of 2014
representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, the learned junior representing for the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further time to argue the matter. As seen from the court records, the learned counsel for the petitioner has been repeatedly seeking adjournments. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the revision petition. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
14.08.2019
Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order vsi2
To The District Munsif, Sankagiri.
2/3
CRP (PD) No.3408 of 2014
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vsi2
CRP (PD)No.3408 of 2014
14.08.2019
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution should be allowed given the petitioner's consistent absence and repeated requests for adjournments.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinna Gounder
S. Sukri @ Kozhandasami
S.Arokiasamy
Abdul Quddhose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
